The Town of Washington, Connecticut
Minutes: Conservation Commission
|
www.WashingtonCT.org The Town of Washington, Connecticut Minutes: Conservation Commission |
|
 |
Disclaimer: While we have attempted to reproduce them accurately, the electronic documents you see here are not the official public documents. Official copies may be obtained on paper from theTown Clerk . Also note that minutes of recent meetings are often not yet approved by the Commission, and are subject to correction.
Jump down to: General information about the Conservation Commission
April 10 •April 2 •February 14 •February 6 •January 10 •January 2 •Previous years: 2007 • 2006 • 2005 • 2004 • 2003 • 2002
Posted: April 30, 2008 April 10, 2008
Open Space Committee
Present: Chairperson Susan Payne, Phil Dutton, Diane Dupuis, Ric Sonder, Joann Caldara, Charles LaMuniere, Phil Markert, Patte DoranGuests: Mark Lyon, Kelly Boling
Susan Payne, Chairperson called the meeting to order at 4:35pm.
Susan Payne introduced Mark Lyon, First Selectman. Mr. Lyon was asked to come to the Conservation Commission to discuss the Commissions Acquisition for Open Space Fund. Ms. Payne said that she estimated the fund to be around $500,000. Mr. Lyon said the fund has been discussed by the current Board of Selectmen through the budget process. Mr. Lyon stated that the fund currently has $502,000 in it and the budget allows another $150,000 to be added to that. The budget is also allowing $50,000 to be added to the Housing Fund that is now $178,000. Mr. Lyon is asking if the Conservation Commission and Open Space Committee have a sense of what they would like to do with this money. He asked if there was a plan to spend this in the not so distant future or if it was being saved and accumulated for something. The $200,000 is approximately 20% of the goal of a total of $1,000,000 a year in the capital budget. He asked if the Conservation Commission/Open Space Committee had a goal other that preserving open space with accumulative $650,000. Mr. Lyon said the Board of Selectmen were questioning if there is and overall approach of the Open Space Committee and is there something out there of interest or should it be funded indefinitely or will the funds be used. Mr. Lyon said that his personal interest would be to see some sort of collaboration of Open Space and Housing. This could result in low impact use of the land and also provide a need. Ms. Payne said that the Committee does have criteria in evaluating parcels of land. She stated that if the right parcel came along she feels there could be collaboration between Housing and Open Space. The Conservation Commission and Open Space Committee is thinking along those lines and maintain an awareness of what comes on the market and if it is something they could present to the Board of Selectmen. Joann Caldara is keeping track of what is on the market. Ms. Payne said that the ordinance clearly states the goal is preserve open space and that up to $6,000 can be spent on an appraisal and due diligence, etc. Mr. Markert pointed out that the Committee has had interest in a couple of properties and that the interest never progressed. One of these properties, he felt, did have the possibility of recreation, housing, and open space. The frustration is not being able to move on something because of the funding process. Mr. Markert said that at this time some land owner may need the funds and will approach the Committee if they know the money is there. Mr. Lyon said that it has to go through the Town of Washington's process and suggested that it would be a good idea to get most of the initial work done before a town meeting.
The Board of Selectmen feels that if the public knew the money was available what the Committee was looking for someone would step up. Ms. Doran stated that criteria were developed to judge parcels and feels that they are too fragmented. Her suggestion is to have mini regions and have criteria based on this. The parcel will then be known as an area that could meet certain needs such as housing or open space or both. Mr. Markert said that the only thing that the criterion can not include is whether or not the property is available and that the offer is opportunistic. Ms. Payne said that the criteria are being established so that there is a framework in which C.C. and O.S. can make a decision. Mr. Boling talked about the C.C. discussion about soliciting proposals. People could be asked and someone may be more likely to offer it to the town. The C.C. could look at the parcel and determine which would be the best value to the tax payers and bring it to the town meeting. Ms. Dupuis stated that she is afraid that this is going to get very competitive and create problems with the people that are offering their land. Mr. Boling believes that if C.C. sets out clear criteria that a decision could be made objectively and presented to the town. Ms. Payne said that C.C. and O.S. want to be proactive and be able to make a suggestion to the town. Ms. Caldara asked if Housing is able to identify a parcel of interest that may have criteria that the C.C. and O.S. are interested in and then they could collaborate. Ms. Payne said that she would ask Wayne Hileman of Housing.
. Ms. Payne summarized that it is clear that the Conservation Commission and Open Space Committee are very interested in collaborating with Housing and that the goal will be to find something and move forward with it. She stated that the good news is that the continuation of the open space fund is perpetual and can be not withstanding from time to time the fund may be unfunded. Mr. Lyon stated that at this point in time there is not any consideration of not funding in the future. He expressed that there is sufficient amount of money that it is time to do something with it. Ms. Payne suggested that counsel be advised to interpret the percentage of the land, if bought in collaboration with Housing is to be allotted for conservation. Ms. Doran brought up the concern of following the exact wording of the mission statement. Mr. Markert said that the wording may need to be amended. Mr. Dutton said that in previous preservation projects people were upset because housing was not included. He received phone calls from people that thought it was confusing to be doing open space with housing with open space that cannot be walked on. He supports the idea of collaboration but thinks it adds another layer of confusion and will slow down the process.
Kelly Boling, Mark Lyon leave 5:15p.m.
Open Space Preservation Possibilities:
Ms. Payne asked Ms. Caldara if any parcels of interest have come on the market. Ms. Caldera said the collaboration would add a whole layer to the process. Ms. Payne said that they would have to find a willing seller to work with that time frame. Mr. LaMuniere said that he has learned that it is hard to consider an application until there has been a site visit. The Open Space Committee discusses the available parcels. Ms. Caldera asked if the land is bought does it have to go through the procedures with Housing and Zoning. Ms. Payne said that C.C./O.S. would be buying the property. Ms. Caldera said that the collaboration would put produce time constraints on the purchase of the land that Open Space is interested in. Ms. Payne said that maybe the money should just be considered for property mainly on conservation/open space criteria. Mr. Markert suggested that a method would be to divide the land into 2 pieces with Housing buying one piece and Conservation/Open Space buying the other.
Ms. Caldera leaves 5:45p.m.
Ms. Doran said that there were three areas that she would like to bring to the attention of the Committee. The first is the McGoogle land, 31.36 acres. Ms. Doran gave an example as to how it could work if Housing developed a large a portion and maybe they would buy it and collaborate with Open Space and conserve a large portion. She also stated that there was a parcel on Nettleton Hollow of 105+ acres of unspoiled farmland. She asked what would be the criteria that the land would need to have if they were to approach Open Space. Mr. Dutton questioned how if the price would disqualify a parcel of land. Ms. Payne showed a map from Steep Rock that shows parcels. Mr. Dutton suggested that the Committee have a copy of that map and it would be useful. Ms. Payne suggested that Tim Abbott from the Greenway Project may be able to produce a more up to date parcel map for the Committee. Mr. Sonder suggested that it could already be on a disk. Ms. Payne said that she would check into the cost and availability.
Ms. Payne said that the Committee needs to come to some direction as to what they can bring to The Board of Selectmen. They need to figure if the collaboration is something they want to explore. Ms. Doran said that maybe it would help to modify the Conservation Commission/Open Space ordinance. Ms. Payne and Ms. Dupuis said they were against that. Ms. Payne suggested that the Committee take one meeting to discuss collaboration. Mr. Markert recommended the possibility of presenting 8 possible properties that more or less have the criteria the Committee is looking for and discuss whether or not they are prepared to make a recommendation on one, maybe they are waiting for the price to come down and do not want to make the decision at this time.
Mr. Markert said it would be helpful to have a piece of paper that has all the available properties and compare them before they can make a recommendation the Board of Selectmen. Ms. Payne Agrees. Ms. Payne offered to ask George Blake for a larger map with plots. Mr. Sonder suggested getting a map from the Assessor's office. Ms. Payne said that she would look into it. Mr. Sonder stated that the money cannot be spent on anything else. Ms. Payne asked if the Committee invests town money in land, does it need to be visible for the public.
Minutes:
Ms. Payne suggested deferring the consideration for the Minutes until next meeting.
Charles LaMuniere leaves 6:05 p.m.
Motion: Susan Payne made a motion to adjourn; Diane Dupuis seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
Susan Payne adjourned meeting at 6:10 p.m.
Submitted subject to approval,
Shelley White, Land Use Clerk
Posted: April 29, 2008 April 2, 2008
Members Present: Susan Payne, Linda Frank, Kelly Boling
Alternate Present: Diane Dupuis, Ric Sonder, Betsy Corrigan
Staff Present: Shelley White
Susan Payne called the meeting to order at 5:07 p.m. and seated members Linda Frank, Kelly Boling, and herself and Alternates Betsey Corrigan and Ric Sonder.
Susan Payne welcomed new member Ric Sonder. He has served on the Roxbury Conservation Commission as Chairman. He served on the Planning Commission. He director of Maritus at the Roxbury Land Trust and was instrumental in the Save our Farms Campaign.
Consideration of the Minutes:
The March 5, 2008 Regular Meeting Minutes were accepted as amended. Page 1 under Referrals and New Projects, 7th line from beginning of the paragraph should read, "She would like to carve off a little piece of the property with the original 19th century house." Page 3, under Archaeological Resources Protection, second line, should read "Ms. Payne, Betsy Corrigan and Sarah Gager from Planning attended." Also, under Open Space, 2nd sentence should read, "Tim Abbott, the leader of the Greenprint Project, will be here to do an update."
Motion: To accept the March 5, 2008 Regular Meeting Minutes of the Conservation Commission as amended. By Linda Frank, Seconded by Susan Payne, passed 3-0-3. Ms. Corrigan, Mr. Sonder & Mr. Boling abstaining because they were not at the last meeting.
Referrals or new projects:
Ms. Payne brought to the attention of the Conservation Commission the revised Conservation Easement for the Abella property off Scofield Hill. There are numerous changes on the proposed revision. Ms. Payne requested that Ms. White send out a copy of the revised easement to the members of the Conservation Commission. Ms. Payne would like the first and revised easement to be reviewed by the Commission. Paul Szymanski, engineer, stated that the proposed changes allow for ATVs and more trees to be cut, etc. Ms. Payne suggested that Szymanski should be invited to the next meeting. She also suggested that member s of the Conservation Commission Compare the first conservation easement for the Abella property to the most recent easement and provide comments. If comments are not available for the May 6th Planning Commission Meeting Janet Hill, Land Use Coordinator should be notified and it will be continued into the June Planning Commission Meeting. Ms. Payne offered to email Mr. Szymanski asking for an explanation of the changes in the easement.
Greenprint Reports and Review of Maps:
Conservation Commission reviewed the Greenprint Maps from Tim Abbott. The Farmland Preservation Study, The Large Forest Habitat Study, & Drinking Water Resources Maps were reviewed. Ms. Payne said that they are closer to having more usable maps. Diane Dupuis suggested that the Drinking Water Resources Map needs to show the aquifers. Betsy Corrigan asked if TPL's ultimate goal was to purchase land. Ms. Payne said that its goal is to provide layers of maps and layers of data that anybody can access. The data is meant to be a tool to help improve regional planning.
Scenic Road Designation:
Ms. Payne said that she, Kelly Boling, and Sarah Gager& Paul Frank of the Planning has been working on a Conservation Easement model for both regulatory and voluntary easements. So that someone that is planning a project will know what is expected and it will cut down time and cost. Mr. Boling requested that the commission looks at the proposed document and discuss any suggestions it at the May 7th meeting. Mr. Boling stated that the future phase of this project is to develop terms and language for different landscape types and also ask for baselines for monitoring purposes. Ms. Payne said that the property will determine how detailed the baselines need to be because they are more expensive with more detail.
Scenic Road:
Ms. Payne asked what the Conservation Commission and the Town of Washington can do to protect Route 202 from becoming a four lane highway. One thing to do is get State Scenic Road Designation that would start at the intersection of Route 45 and 202 to include New Preston Falls and up to the town border. Mr. Boling suggested a boundary change that would extend up to Mt. Tom Pass Way and would include Mt. Tom pond and State Park and it should include the area from the south side of Christian Street to include the falls. He believes that it would strengthen the application. Ms. Payne acknowledged that Mr. Boling has worked hard and has done great work. Mr. Boling also suggested that he would like to get letters of support from Jodi Rell, Roraback, O'Neill, Chris Murphy...state officials. Ms. Payne suggested that maybe they should ask HVA to provide a support letter. Ms. Payne offered to contact Mr. Roraback, & HVA. Mr. Boling said he could contact Ms. Rell, Steep Rock Association. Ms. Frank offered to contact Chris Murphy. Ms. Payne asked Mr. Boling if a letter could be drafted with the general information of the area. Ms. Payne asked if historical houses and structures should be named. Mr. Boling showed the pictures that he would be sending with the Scenic Road Application. Mr. Boling stated that the application should also include the Existing and Perceived Open Space map. Letters of support should go to the State with the application as well. Ms. Payne offered to ask Mr. Ian Branson, a Forester, which is knowledgeable of the geology of the area to write a support letter.
Archaeological Resources Protection:
Ms. Corrigan stated that the Town of Washington Planning Regulations makes reference to protecting the archaeological resources of the area. So, Ms. Corrigan has worked on a proposed amendment to the planning regulations to better define archaeological sites and preservation. Ms. Corrigan created a proposed procedure of the process. Step 1 would an application comes before a Land Use board and the project area is reviewed. This would entail determining if the project falls within the polygons shown on the Archaeological Sensitivity Map. The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) will review potential sensitivity. If OSA determines that the site is in a polygon they would continue to Step 2. Step 2(Phase I Survey) would require test pits that would determine significance of the site. If there is no significance the process ends here. Step 3(Phase II Survey) would be the next step if there is significance. This would entail larger test pits to determine the degree of significance. If there is the possibility of significance, then leave it alone (conserve in situ). If it is not possible to conserve in situ then move on to Step 4. Step 4(Phase III SurveyData Recovery) would be to excavate a percentage of the site and to conserve most of the site rather than fully excavate it. Artifacts are catalogued and studied and returned to the property owner. Ms. Corrigan noted that this is a state service and that there is no cost to the applicant. Mr. Sonder asked if the Phase I & Phase II Survey are paid by the applicant. Ms. Corrigan was not sure and she would check into that. Mr. Boling asked if the Planning or Zoning Commissions have given any feedback. Ms. Payne said that Sarah Gager from Planning has been working on this and that the Conservation Commission can present what they have to the Zoning Commission when they are ready. Ms. Corrigan stated that many towns (about 40) in Connecticut already have Archaeological Regulations. Mr. Sonder stated that Zoning and Planning should be involved but that it would be odd regulations in both. Ms. Payne agreed and said that the planning regulations mention preservation of archaeological sites under the open space section 5.8. In the zoning regulations under section 13 there were a number of different places that archaeological sites were referenced. Ms. Payne said that these regulations, in her opinion could be expanded. Ms. Payne stated that Mark Lyon, First Selectman for the Town of Washington is concerned about the burden of more regulations on the property owner. Ms. Corrigan said that there would be a prescreening. Nick Belllantoni will be asked to provide a map for Land Use to help with the prescreening process. The idea is to make to make the process easy. Ms. Frank asked if someone were to buy a piece of property would they be required to come into the office and would they then be told as to what can be built on the possible piece of property. Ms. Payne said the next step is to get the language established for the regulations. Mr. Boling suggested that maybe Sarah Gager could produce a draft. Ms. Corrigan said she will ask Sarah Gager. Ms. Payne said she will ask Gary Fitzherbert in Zoning. Ms. Frank asked if the commission should ask a builder. Mr. Sonder asked if the state had power. Ms. Corrigan said that it is the town's responsibility. Ms. Payne said that it is up to each municipality to monitor and predict how stringent they want to be. Mr. Sonder said that a much simpler regulation would say that 'you must check if the area falls into a polygon and there is a procedure in a manual that you must follow'. Ms. Payne asked Mr. Sonder to help draft some simple language. Mr. Sonder said he would.
Cell Tower:
Mr. Boling stated that she understand why people do not like the fake tree cell tower but she thinks it may have looked better than the one that was put up in New Preston. Ms. Dupuis said the fake tree is much larger that the tower that was installed. The installed tower was supposed to be brown and the fake tree would look odd as there aren't any conifers in the vicinity.
Ridgeline Protection:
Ms. Frank stated that there was a question regarding a slight change in the zoning regulations that try to keep from having enormous structures built on steep/ridgeline areas. The architect is having trouble calculating in his design with these changes. Mr. Sonder stated that people tend to raise the grade. It was suggested to Zoning that the height of the house should be calculated from the existing grade instead of a created grade. That was accepted by Zoning and language was created that defines what how to calculate the average and where to measure from. The architect stated that there are better ways to measure and simply took the average of the measurements around the entire perimeter of the house. Mr. Sonder agreed that the method was correct and the wording would use some adjustment. Ms. Frank said that there will be a public hearing on May 15th and she will find out if the Conservation Commission was asked to provide comments. She said will draft something for the meeting so that it will go on record. Mr. Sonder said that there has never been anything done on ridgeline protection and if that is something the commission would like to do. Mr. Boling said the Conservation Commission would like to do it but doesn't think Zoning is interested. Ms. Frank said she would like to talk to the people in Kent to see how successful the zones are that had been established. Mr. Boling believes that they are happy with it and the difficult thing is the need for good mapping which costs money. Ms. Payne stated that there is money in the budget for mapping and that she is in favor of keeping ridgeline protection going. Ms. Corrigan suggested that something basic be done such as not allowing clear cutting but maybe seasonal or selective cutting. Mr. Sonder said that the areas of concern be defined in terms of mapping and the elevation be picked for that particular area. Mr. Boling suggested that there needs to be a map that triggers closer scrutiny.
Other Business:
Ms. Payne stated that she read in the Planning minutes that there will be mobile units mounted on existing sign posts that read oncoming cars speed. They will be 12x12 inches.
16 Titus Garage Committee update: A request for a dog park was discussed and not favored. There are two acres available and this could be used for housing. There will be perk testing and demolition and cleanup of the old garage. The old metal building will be taken down but the foundation will stay. It was suggested that it could be used for a pavilion or something.
Ms. Payne stated that Open Space has money in its acquisition fund. Mr. Boling had a recommendation that the Town of Washington should solicit and publicize request of land owners that would be interested in selling some land. Ms. Dupuis said that the land owners should be informed of the guidelines. Ms. Payne said this deserves more thought. Mr. Boling said that we could solicit proposals and the commission could recommend a site. Ms. Frank suggested that we have a map that shows properties and the criteria that the Conservation Commission is looking for and then approach the land owner. Ms. Payne suggested that the ideal plan would contain open space criteria and the ability to use part of the property for affordable housing. Mr. Boling offered to draft something for the next meeting.
Motion: To adjourn the meeting by Susan Payne.
Susan Payne adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Shelley White
Land Use Clerk
4-17-08
Posted: February 27, 2008 February 14, 2008
Open Space Committee
Present: Chairperson Susan Payne, Charles LaMuniere, Joann Caldara, Phil Dutton, Phil MarkertSusan Payne, Chairperson, called the meeting to order at 4:50PM. She asked the members to look over the January minutes if they had not already done so.
Minutes: In looking over the minutes, Susan Payne said she would like to clarify the fact that she had invited John Boyer to come to the meeting because of the Washington Housing Trust.
Motion: Joann Caldara made a motion to accept the minutes of January 10, 2008, with an addition stating: Susan Payne asked John Boyer to attend because of the Washington Community Housing Trust. The motion was seconded by Charles LaMuniere and passed unanimously.
Susan Payne reminded the members that Pam Osborne is now working for Probate and will no longer be secretary for Conservation and Open Space. Ms. Payne told the members that Pam was very touched by their thank-you.
Phil Dutton arrived at 5:00PM.
Ms. Payne said Rick Distel was out of town and she did not know if he had completed the Marbledale Historic District Survey.
Ms. Payne suggested to the members that they could discuss the Plan of Development or review Open Space possibilities.
Mr. Markert said he would like to talk about Regulations. That is, a fee in lieu of set-backs. He said some years ago he asked Andrew Rohraback for his thoughts on this. Mr. Rohraback came back with the opinion that Planning Commissions may require a developer to pay fees in lieu of providing open space subdivision regulation requirements. Mr. Markert said he has lots of info from different towns. Some towns have very strong wording. We could be a lot more demanding regarding ridge lines, historic districts, etc. Calhoun Street is getting out of hand with inappropriate buildings. We are increasingly concerned about open space. Our regulations should reflect what the town wants to do with the land. Regulations need to be explicit. Mr. LaMuniere said Zoning regulations are more explicit than Inland-Wetland Regs.
The members discussed ways to keep projects from getting out of hand. Joann Caldara asked about stricter enforcement. Mr. Dutton agreed - there needs to be a way to over see projects so they don't get out of hand. Also mentioned was the suggestion to institute a schedule of fines based on the value of the property. Mr. LaMuniere noted that Inland-Wetlands can only charge a max of $1000. Any schedule of fines should be backed by a Town ordinance.
The members discussed whether they could make changes to the Regs within the existing State Statutes. Ms. Payne stated they must start with the Selectmen and get their support; then Land Use. She said the Commissions should get together once a month, because they all overlap today. It is critical to get the Chairs together once a month to meet with the First Selectman to discuss pressing issues. Ms. Payne said she would contact the First Selectman about this.
Ms. Payne adjourned the meeting at 5:50PM.
Submitted subject to approval,
Martha T. Shade, Secretary
Posted: February 15, 2008 February 6, 2008
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Boling, Mrs. Frank, Mr. Markert, Mrs. Payne
ALTERNATE PRESENT: Mrs. Corrigan
STAFF PRESENT: Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Atty. Fisher
Mrs. Payne called the meeting to order at 5:01 p.m. and seated Members Boling, Frank, Markert, and Payne and Alternate Corrigan.
Mrs. Payne noted the resignation of the Commission's clerk, Mrs. Osborne. She said Mrs. Osborne had done a great job for the Commission and would be missed very much.
Consideration of the Minutes
The 1/2/08 Regular Meeting minutes were accepted as amended. On page 3, first full paragraph, 4th line: Mr. Markert asked that "perhaps solicit opportunities" at the end of the sentence be deleted. Mr. Boling thought this might be a reference to the statement he had made that the Commission should be proactive in open space issues.
MOTION: To accept the 1/2/08 Regular Meeting minutes
as amended. By Mrs. Frank, seconded by Mr.
Boling, and passed 5-0.
Bowles/52 Carmel Hill Road/2 Lot Subdivision/Review of Open Space and Proposed Conservation Easement Language: Mrs. Corrigan recused herself because she is a neighbor. The map, "Site Analysis Plan," by Mr. Alex, revised to 1/2/08 was reviewed. Mrs. Payne noted this had been discussed at the last meeting and the Commission had determined that 1) the proposed open space was not contiguous to other open space, 2) the proposed location of the open space was not beneficial; it would serve a better purpose if located along the road as a buffer, and 3) a fee in lieu of open space would be appropriate in this case. Atty. Fisher did not agree. He said the proposed open space at the rear of the property was close to, although not adjoining, the open space on the Davenport property. Instead of open space along the front, he said Mr. Bowles proposed a deed restriction there so that anything other than a driveway would have to be located further back on the property. He added that the Planning Commission had agreed to this proposal. Mrs. Corrigan pointed out that there was a huge wetlands system at the rear of the property, so that it made sense biologically to protect that portion of the lot. Atty. Fisher also stated that Mr. Bowles was not a developer and could not afford to pay a fee in lieu of the open space requirement. Mrs. Payne pointed out that open space would be in perpetuity, but a deed restriction would not. She asked who would be responsible for monitoring the deed restricted area. Atty. Fisher said the owner of the adjoining property would have the right to enforce it. Mr. Boling asked if the deed restriction would be in place at the time the subdivision mylar was filed. Atty. Fisher offered to add the deed restriction as a note on the mylar and the commissioners agreed that this should be done. Mrs. Payne voiced her concern that since the front of the property would not be covered by the conservation easement, the traditional landscaping and existing stonewall would need protection. She asked if protective language could be added to the deed restriction. Atty. Fisher noted that the stonewalls in the front and between the two lots were boundary lines and so he thought the addition of such provisions was not necessary. Mrs. Payne noted that the Commission did not want to create a hardship for the property owner.
MOTION: Regarding the Bowles/52 Carmel Hill Road/2 Lot
Subdivision application; that the Washington
Conservation Commission is satisfied with the
boundaries and configuration of the proposed
open space as shown on the map, "Proposed Site
Development Plan, by Mr. Neff, revised to 1/3/08,
and with the additional deed restriction as
discussed at its 2/6/08 meeting subject to the
following conditions:
1. that the Commission review the proposed
conservation easement language and
2. that a note concerning the deed restriction
be placed on the mylar to be recorded on
the Town Land Records.
By Mr. Boling, seconded by Mrs. Frank, and
passed 4-0.
Mrs. Corrigan had recused herself because she is
a neighbor.
Atty. Fisher noted he had attempted to simplify the conservation easement language normally used by Steep Rock, Weantinogue, and others. Mrs. Payne and Mr. Boling advised him that they are working with members of the Planning Commission to draft model easements to simplify the process in the future. Mrs. Payne noted the proposed Bowles conservation easement language would be discussed later in the meeting.
Mrs. Corrigan was reseated.
Environmental Task Force: Mr. Davis, Washington Environmental Council President, spoke at length about the environmental task force being established in Town and he circulated an organizational draft sheet dated February 2008. He stated that the goals of the task force would include advising the Board of Selectmen and the Town on public environmental policies and coordinating the efforts of existing organizations in Town. He informed the Commission that the Board of Selectmen had set the following issues as its priorities: smart power, green architecture, recycling, night lighting, and invasive plants. Each of these topics was discussed and information presented on each. This included: 1) smart power: The goal will be to get 200 homes in Town to sign up to buy clean energy from clean vendors. The Town will receive a free solar panel valued at $10,000 when 100 homes have signed up. 2) green architecture: Mr. Davis said the flagship project could be the Primary School, but that this effort would encompass more than just school buildings. 3) recycling: Mr. Davis said recycling has stagnated at only 15% participation in Washington, while other surrounding towns have much higher percents. Opening the transfer station on Sunday afternoons, picking up trash weekly instead of bi weekly, trying experimental recycling bins such as those being tested elsewhere in the state, getting the schools to participate, and installing recycling containers in prominent locations around Town were ideas suggested to try to improve participation in Washington. All present thought the Town government and the schools should have a 100% participation rate. 4) night lighting: Mr. Boling noted that $17,000 had been spent on street lights last year and he recommended that the Town decommission all street lights not in commercial districts. Mr. Davis also recommended that caps and timers be used, which he noted would be expensive, but would pay off in only a few years. 5) invasive plants: Town projects to control invasives such as the recent efforts in New Preston along the river would be supported. Mr. Davis asked for a representative from the Conservation Commission to serve on the task force. Anyone with ideas or who would like to serve may contact Mr. Davis at elliot@nextwavefunds.com.
Water Resources Monitoring and Protection: Mr. Markert said he would continue to work with Mr. Davis on water testing.
Mr. Markert left the meeting at 5:57 p.m.
Bowles/52 Carmel Hill Road/2 Lot Subdivision/Conservation Easement Language: The following revisions to the proposed language were discussed. Page 3, 3b: Mrs. Frank asked that the phrase, "such as traditional, rural New England farm stonewalls" be added. Page 3, 4b: Mr. Boling said this point should be deleted. Page 3, 4c: Mr. Boling asked that the following phrase be added: "subject to review and approval by the grantee." Page 3, 4c: Mrs. Corrigan asked that the following be added: The right to plant and otherwise grow "native species that are indigenous to the region".... Mrs. Payne read a section from the Canning conservation easement, which Mr. Boling thought could replace 3b and 4b here. It was agreed that the right to use chemical herbicides for the removal of invasive species as defined by the State of Ct. should be permitted providing all regulations regarding their use would be complied with. Mrs. Hill was requested to forward these requested revisions to Atty. Fisher. Mr. Boling asked if the revised document would be sent to Atty. Miles for review. Mrs. Payne said it would.
New Preston Falls Project: Mrs. Payne noted the Village Improvement Society had plans to make improvements at the falls. The planting plan, "Town of Washington, 5 East Shore Road," by Mrs. Rabinowicz, dated 9/12/07 was reviewed. Mrs. Payne asked Mrs. Corrigan to review the proposed plant list. It was noted the plans call for getting the knot weed under control, taking out the trees growing in the dam, opening up a view of the falls, and doing a general clean up of the area, but that a manicured landscape was not the goal. It was thought that possibly a state grant and/or money from the greenways fund could be used for the herbicide application and tree removal.
Town Beach: Mrs. Payne reported that the plans are available in the Town Hall for public review and that a recent article in Voices had given a good summary of the proposal.
Nettleton Hollow Road Culvert Replacement: Mrs. Hill reported that the plans called for the placement of a natural bottom in the culvert, the restoration of the rip rapped portion of the streambanks to natural vegetation, and the installation of root wads to improve the habitat for fish. The commissioners voiced their concern about the new guardrails to be installed. Mrs. Payne recommended guardrails like those on Judd's Bridge Road in Roxbury. Mrs. Frank said that in the Kent Hollow Road/Rt. 341 area there were burnished square metal guardrails that would be appropriate to use on Nettleton Hollow Road. Mrs. Corrigan noted there are archeological sites along the Sprain Brook corridor and asked since the project is state funded, if the state archeologist would be present when the project was underway. She will contact the state archeologist.
Conservation Easement Process: Mrs. Payne reported that she and Mr. Boling had met with Mr. Frank and Ms. Gager from the Planning Commission to begin work on draft conservation easement forms.
Possible Mundy Property Consolidated School Site: Mrs. Payne thought that because Washington is part of the regional school district, it would be appropriate for the Conservation Commission to voice its opinion about the Mundy site. She thought it was an environmentally sensitive site that would be severely compromised by the construction of a school. Mrs. Corrigan agreed. She circulated copies of the editorial that had run in the Spectrum. Mr. Boling said he was concerned that a statement concerning this particular site could be misconstrued as a position on consolidation. It was the consensus not to issue a formal opinion at this time.
Cluster Development: Mrs. Payne, Ms. Gager from the Planning Commission, and a representative from the Zoning Commission will begin researching the issue of cluster development. Mrs. Payne noted this is referenced in the Plan of Conservation and Development as a method to manage growth.
Archeological Resources: Mrs. Payne and Ms. Gager will meet with the state archeologist on 2/29 to discuss how the protection of archeological resources can be written into the land use regulations.
Scenic Road Designation for Rt. 202: The Commission will discuss this matter at its next meeting.
"Kilowatt Ours": The Garden Club is sponsoring a seminar on smart power on 2/16 at the library and 2/21 at the Town Hall.
MOTION: To adjourn the meeting. By Mrs. Frank.
Mrs. Payne adjourned the meeting at 6:41 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill, Land Use Coordinator
Posted: January 18, 2008 January 10, 2008
Open Space Committee
Present: Chairperson Susan Payne, Charles LaMuniere, Joann Caldara, Chick Treadway, Phil DuttonGuests: Wayne Hileman, John Boyer
Susan Payne Chairperson called the meeting to order at 4:40pm.
Minutes: In looking over the minutes Charles LaMuniere amended the motion to read: .... There was discussion of the Housing Commission, Washington Housing Trust and Open Space Committee having conversation, on how to align goals and work together. This needs to be followed up on.
Motion: Joann Caldara made a motion to accept the minutes of the November 8, 2007 meeting of the Open Space Committee as amended, Susan Payne seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
Susan Payne introduced Wayne Hileman, Chairman of the Housing Commission whom she invited to the Open Space Committee meeting to give an update and thoughts on possible future pooling of resources. Wayne Hileman began by informing members that the Housing Commission oversees the affordable housing fund which presently has $175,000.00. Mr. Hileman described the Housing Commission as a more passive commission and went on to say that someone petitions the commission for funds, the Housing Commission does not use the funds. The Affordable Housing Fund was set up separate from the Open Space Fund, the Housing Commission accepts a request which then goes on to the Board of Selectmen, Board of Finance and finally to a Town Meeting. Charles LaMuniere suggested pooling funds from the Open Space Committee, Housing Commission and Washington Housing Trust. Chick Treadway asked Wayne if the Housing Commission was actively looking for affordable housing parcels. Wayne answered that the Housing Commission doesn't implement or build they are a research and development vehicle, a more passive role which steers people toward other resources. He went on to say that they are not an Affordable Housing Commission, they study all housing needs and spoke about the Affordable Housing Appeals Act and the point system for designated affordable housing units.
John Boyer arrived at 4:55pm.
Members went on to discuss a limited equity parcel program, which purchases a parcel of land that is then offered for building. This takes the high land price out of the equation; the parcel is leased to a person who acquires a mortgage to build a home on the land. Wayne Hileman spoke about the success the Town of Litchfield has had with this program they have done eighteen homes in the past twelve years. Looking at the town's planning and zoning regulation, they do a good job preserving farmland and forest but perhaps could be relaxed for single family housing development. Mr. Hileman understands the reluctance of the Zoning Commission to crack the door; he feels that ultimately it is all about the price of land. Mr. Boyer stated that under section 13 of the Zoning Regulations there is allowance for the Town of Washington or Non-Profit Sponsored Affordable Housing. He went on to suggest a price of $200,000.00, a cottage about 1500sq. ft. with price to include well and septic. Susan Payne told Mr. Hileman and Mr. Boyer that the Open Space Commission was going to look at Town owned land and land on the market. Wayne Hileman noted that there is no incentive to donate land for housing. Susan Payne asked what the present strategy is for the Washington Housing Trust. Mr. Boyer stated that they have a waiting list for all three of their properties Dodge Farm, Riverwoods and Church Street, they are refocusing on single family homes, and they have limited equity.
Wayne Hileman and John Boyer left the meeting at 5:30pm.
Members briefly discussed land acquisition, cultivating the Open Space Fund and doing their homework in the mean time.
Susan Payne reported on open space preservation in the Town of Washington during 2007. Figures included approximately 218 acres added in 2007, bringing the total to 5818 acres of permanently preserved open space in Washington. This would be 23.5% toward the Town's goal of 30%. Ms. Payne also made note of 6 farm properties along the ridge on the New Milford/Washington town line, she felt that the Town of New Milford was paying attention to these properties and they could impact Washington.
In closing Ms. Payne circulated a check list from the 2003 Plan of Conservation and Development and asked members to look it over to see what has been accomplished and what can be worked on, members will discuss at the February meeting.
Adjourned at 6:10pm.
Submitted subject to approval,
Pamela L. Osborne, Secretary
Posted: January 6, 2008 January 2, 2008
Present: Susan Payne Chairperson, Kelly Boling, Linda Frank, Joe Gitterman, Philip MarkertGuests: Adelaide Roberts, Public
Susan Payne began the meeting by noting that regular members Linda Frank, Philip Markert and alternate member Elizabeth Corrigan were reappointed to the Conservation Commission for a three year term which runs until January 1, 2011 by the Board of Selectman.
Minutes of December 4, 2007: Ms. Payne made the following corrections to the minutes: on page 2, throughout replace Council with Counsel, on page three, fourth paragraph, add .... they spoke about development patterns and adopting regulations that accomplish what we want., page 3, under Other Business, line 2, replace step with steep.
MOTION: Phil Markert made a motion to accept the minutes of the December 4, 2007 meeting of the Conservation Commission as amended, Linda Frank seconded the motion, which passed by four votes with Kelly Boling abstaining because he was not present.
Election of Officers:
Motion: Joe Gitterman made a motion to elect Susan Payne as Chairperson and Kelly Boling as Vice- Chair, Linda Frank seconded the motion which passed unanimously.
Ms. Payne updated members on permanently preserved open space in the town of Washington through 2007, stating that Steep Rock Association had acquired 89 acres, Weantinoge Heritage Land Trust acquired 77 acres and the Town of Washington acquired 13.5 acres through set asides and easements. Susan calculated the permanently protected open space at approximately 23.5% presently in the Town of Washington. She went on to say that 136 acres in Roxbury/Washington was acquired by the Roxbury Land Trust, this is property belonging to Arthur Carter. Joe Gitterman asked about looking at a map showing preservation that includes surrounding towns. Susan Payne answered that the Litchfield Hills Greenprint is a good source. In closing Ms. Payne noted that Weantinoge Heritage Land Trust owns 277.5 acres of permanently protected open space in the Town of Washington.
Referrals or new projects:
Bowles, 52 Carmel Hill Road: The Planning Commission has a proposal for a subdivision for this property which will require open space set aside, Janet Hill noted that the maps calculations were incorrect. Members went ahead and commented on what was proposed, the set asides appear to be located on the north end of the property. Members were in agreement that the Planning Commission should ask for a fee in lieu of the proposed open space set aside. Adelaide Roberts, Chairperson of the Planning Commission addressed members saying the general rule for the Planning Commission open space set aside is that it should be contiguous with other open space parcels or preserve the roadscape. A discussion ensued between members and Ms. Roberts which included wetland/upland preservation, monitoring and asking for a fee in lieu of open space set aside. The Planning and Conservation commissions have started working together on procedures for acquiring conservation easements. Members remained in agreement that the Planning Commission should ask for a fee in lieu of open space set aside or move the open space to protect the roadscape. Kelly Boling suggested allowing septic and driveway to be located within the eased area.
Klein/Cannizzaro, 285 West Shore Road & Tinker Hill Road: This proposal is between sisters and is exempt from open space set aside. Members did note that there is a proposal for a conservation easement area to include Ash Swamp, the Planning Commission is holding a public hearing on this application tonight.
The Planning Commission has requested that commissions look at implementation of the 2003 Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD). Ms. Payne noted that Elaine Luckey had researched the 1993 POCD and found that quite a lot had been implemented. Ms. Roberts added that this being at midpoint it would serve as a check up to get a sense of what had been done and get suggestions from Land Use boards.
Members looked at what has been done to preserve rural character, enhance village centers, guide housing development and address other community issues within their commission.
Preserve Rural Character
Natural Resource Elements: members felt that through set asides wetland/watercourse and natural systems protection has been accomplished. Phil Markert will look into continued water testing through the Washington Environmental Council (WEC).
Open Space: an Open Space Committee has been established, a plan adopted and fund set up.
Scenic Resources: members worked with Zoning on ridgeline protection. A Scenic Road Ordinance was established and members are working toward Scenic Road status for a section of Route 202.
Agricultural Land and Farming: In supporting local agriculture Kelly Boling suggested the creation of a farmers market in the village center, other member's suggestions for the farm market were along Route 202, expand existing farm stands or at the Washington Primary School grounds. Susan Payne will address this with the selectmen.
Historical Resources: Susan Payne and Betsy Corrigan are working toward encouraging responsible archeological investigations.
Enhance Village Centers
Conservation Design Subdivisions: Members talked about cluster/conservation development. Phil Markert commented about the overlapping powers of the committees and how the Conservation Commission has only advisory powers. Communication between the commissions is key.
In closing Ms. Payne stated that the Conservation Commission will keep on top of resource protection and look for opportunities to use the Open Space Acquisition Funds. Mr. Markert commented that thus far this has been a reactive process instead of proactive, he felt priorities should be established, perhaps solicit opportunities. Members will revisit tax abatement for permanently protected open space. Kelly Boling offered to put together the application for scenic road designation for a section of Route 202. Phil Markert will check into water quality monitoring and Susan Payne and Betsy Corrigan will work on archeological resource protection.
Upcoming Events
January 7th @ 8:30pm joint meeting between Washington Zoning Commission & Planning Commission
January 12th @ 1:00pm educational forum "Responsible Tower Siting, It's More Than Aesthetics" , Cornwall Town Hall
January 29th workshop on roles and responsibilities of land use commissioners in Goshen
Members decided to maintain their goals from 2007:
Route 2020 Enhancement
Key properties/areas of Town to conserve/permanently protect
Strategies for land Preservation
TDR's (Transfer of Development Rights)
Municipal Tax Abatement for Conservation Easements
Conservation or Cluster Development
Adjourned at 6:50pm.
Next scheduled meeting of the Washington Conservation Commission is February 6, 2008 at 5:00pm.
Submitted subject to approval,
Pamela L. Osborne, Secretary
Meetings in 2007